The advocate for New Zealanders mental health
BY Ivan Yeo

East meet west?

• 3 min read

Culture barriers

The Western concept of recovery in mental health and addiction is shaped by an individualistic worldview. At its heart, it values self-determination and personal agency—principles grounded in human rights, where each person is encouraged to take charge of their own healing and direction.

This approach has helped many, yet it can also create unspoken barriers when applied in contexts where collectivism, not individualism, forms the cultural baseline. This is especially true for many in Asian communities.

 Cross-cultural miscommunication

What I want to be clear about is this: this isn’t about criticising the Western bio-psycho-social model. It’s not about what’s right or wrong. It’s about noticing where things may not connect, and where cross-cultural miscommunication might quietly happen—not because of bad intentions, but because the frameworks we use sometimes miss the deeper cultural settings people carry with them.

 Since my time at Mind and Body, I’ve been thinking about this a lot—about how Western mental health systems sit alongside Eastern cultural values. It started as a quiet observation, something I noticed in conversations and community spaces. Over time, it became something I actively brought into my work, a lens I continue to return to whenever I support others or reflect on how services are delivered.

Soloist or Orchestra? 

 One way I’ve often explained this difference is through the metaphor of a soloist and an orchestra.In an orchestra, everyone has an instrument and a defined role. The focus isn’t on standing out, but on contributing to something shared. Each musician follows the score, and the goal is to stay in harmony. When someone plays out of tune, it’s not just a personal mistake—it disrupts the whole sound. In many collectivist cultures, this sense of harmony isn’t just musical.

East

It’s social. It’s emotional. It’s built into how people live and relate to each other. If one person struggles, it can bring shame—not just on the individual, but on their family or community. That shame can be quiet, but heavy.

West

By contrast, the Western approach is often more like a solo performance. You pick your own instrument, find your voice, and play in a way that expresses who you are. The aim is to be seen, to be heard, to be different. Autonomy is celebrated.

In collectivist cultures, there is still talent, still skill, still agency—but it flows in a different way. The orchestra often has a conductor. People don’t wait to be noticed; they wait for cues. There is a deep respect for structure and guidance. Surrendering to the conductor isn’t weakness—it’s alignment.

 When we bring this metaphor into the world of mental health recovery, the tensions start to become clearer. A model that assumes people will naturally take initiative, speak up, and make decisions may unintentionally leave some feeling uncertain or even alienated. Especially for Asian migrants, where mental health hasn’t always been part of public conversation, and where help-seeking itself might carry stigma, being told to take charge of your own recovery can feel like being asked to perform a piece of music without ever seeing the sheet. 

 Of course, metaphors simplify things—but they can still reveal something useful. In many Asian contexts, mental health has not been a government priority. Services may be unfamiliar or distrusted. So when someone arrives in front of a mental health professional and is asked to make choices, it may not be that they don’t know how. It may be that they’ve been taught their whole lives to put the group before the self, to follow rather than direct, and to avoid disrupting harmony at all costs.

That doesn’t mean they’re passive. It means the system needs to slow down and offer clearer cues. It means being willing to explain, not assume. When that happens—even in small ways—it can ease early engagement, build trust, and open the door to something more respectful and inclusive.

 My question is this

Has your service made space for collectivist values? Not just in words, but in rhythm. Are we offering the right tools—but also the right tempo? One that allows people from all cultures to not only join, but feel they belong—not as soloists, but as part of something shared. I'd love to hear what you have to say. There's a comments box below. Leave your thoughts right there.

Other posts you might be interested in

Horizon Newsletter

The advocate for New Zealander's mental health

Sign up for free